After |
Aesthetically, if you look at the after picture compared to the before picture, you may say, "They looked better before."
They did, somewhat, but they are diseased and were living in a situation which was only going to create more problems.
Also, they were inundated with various vines (redirecting and killing some branches) which the owner had a difficult time recognizing and keeping up with because the canopies (the lowest branches) were hovering over or reaching the ground.
Before |
This is the agenda I set forth in the first article:
- Lower the overall height of the shrubs without topping and therefore creating a much larger mess.
- Prune for health reasons, removing as many disease-affected branches as feasible.
- Do so while sanitizing pruning tools involving stems or branches suspect or diseased.
- Increase airflow throughout the entire cluster of shrubs.
- Raise canopies and adjust (lower) the reach and timing of the irrigation system which is keeping the area too moist.
- Prune for aesthetics where desired.
Most cuts, by far, were predicated by the cankers, particularly those completely girdling a branch. Most height reduction was made with a thinning cut back to a secondary branch or the trunk.
I raised the canopy (lower-most branches) a bit more than planned, mainly due to water sprouts which had become weak drooping branches.
It will take months to see how these girls respond. Hopefully, after some drying time for the soil, we can ask the customer about re-establishing the bed borders and applying some mulch.
This is the least viewed area on this gorgeous property. Perhaps we can get it off the least healthy list.
Winter is a great time to address such issues, and pruning, particularly with evergreens.
No comments:
Post a Comment